Student View
The student side was also very familiar in its appearance. Students see assignments they are expected to complete, and the layout is logical. Students also have a button to dispute their grade, which will send a message to the teacher regarding this. Student-self-assessment is always a goal in education, and used intentionally, the dispute opportunity for students can compel some self-reflection of their work.
It is in the writing of the student that the magic happens.
Assessing the Tool
For my assessment of this tool, I created a class and I assigned an essay on this history of AI. I then added a fake student to my class, and assigned the essay to this fake student. Then I grabbed a Chromebook and through the email from Class Companion, I was able to join this fake class.
I opened the assignment and was greeted with a space in which to complete my essay. I opened my literature review chapter and copy/pasted my first three paragraphs into the tool. It took some time for it to assess my work, (it wrote some entertaining phrases on the screen while I waited) and I must mention that I did not provide the entire essay to the tool, so some parts of the formative assessment are weak due to the tool not having all of my writing to assess (no conclusion, namely!)
Overall
Additional testing revealed that it will adjust its scoring if the teacher changes the rubric, and the overall formative assessment was accurate, as tested by teachers.
There is an interesting reflective opportunity for teachers here; an opportunity to compare their own grading against that of the AI tool. That’s not to say that the tool is correct and the teacher is wrong; not by any stretch. It’s just an opportunity for teachers to consider their rubrics and their own tendencies when grading is occurring.
As the teacher, I can override grades given by the tool, allowing me to have the final say as to a student’s performance on the written task.
Overall, I was impressed with this tool.